UPDATED: 09-08-25 10:43 PDT

men Mercer 1
  
Mercer                
W-L: (12- 7) PR = 86.1354

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 211 H South Florida AAC (13- 5, 88.3) 8-11 215 A Virginia Tech ACC ( 9- 9, 88.6) 7-11 219 H Vanderbilt AAC ( 9- 9, 86.6) 7-19 226 H Kennesaw State Atlantic Sun ( 4-11, 80.2) 20- 4 304 A Arizona State Big 12 (11- 8, 88.8) 10-16 307 N UC Davis Big 12 ( 6-10, 86.3) 18-11 311 A Clemson ACC (13- 6, 91.3) 11-10 315 H Florida Big 12 (17- 2, 94.2) 9-22 326 H Jacksonville Atlantic Sun (10- 6, 86.9) 14-16 329 H Wofford Big South ( 9-10, 80.7) 22- 8 402 A Gardner Webb Big South ( 3-14, 76.0) 17- 4 405 H Radford Big South ( 2-14, 73.7) 20- 7 409 A Presbyterian Big South ( 5-12, 75.7) 21- 4 412 H High Point Big South (12- 6, 86.4) 16-13 419 A Winthrop Big South ( 6-11, 79.7) 15-14 423 H Furman Big South (14- 4, 84.2) 17-18 426 A Longwood Big South ( 1-14, 75.9) 19- 1 502 H Wofford Big South ( 9-10, 80.7) 15- 9 504 H High Point Big South (12- 6, 86.4) 16- 8

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   211 H South Florida           8-11      -3    -2          -1.27
   215 A Virginia Tech           7-11      -4    -3          -1.12
   219 H Vanderbilt              7-19     -12     0    --    -4.97
   226 H Kennesaw State         20- 4      16     6           0.00
   304 A Arizona State          10-16      -6    -3          -1.83
   307 N UC Davis               18-11       7     0    ++     5.18
   311 A Clemson                11-10       1    -6    +++    6.00
   315 H Florida                 9-22     -13    -8           0.00
   326 H Jacksonville           14-16      -2     0          -1.75
   329 H Wofford                22- 8      14     6           0.00
   402 A Gardner Webb           17- 4      13    10           0.00
   405 H Radford                20- 7      13    13           0.00
   409 A Presbyterian           21- 4      17    10           0.00
   412 H High Point             16-13       3     0    +      2.79
   419 A Winthrop               15-14       1     6    --    -4.00
   423 H Furman                 17-18      -1     2    -     -3.44
   426 A Longwood               19- 1      18    10           0.00
   502 H Wofford                15- 9       6     6           0.00
   504 H High Point             16- 8       8     0    ++     4.79

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   219 H Vanderbilt              7-19     -12     0    --    -4.97
   419 A Winthrop               15-14       1     6    --    -4.00
   423 H Furman                 17-18      -1     2    -     -3.44

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   311 A Clemson                11-10       1    -6    +++    6.00
   307 N UC Davis               18-11       7     0    ++     5.18
   504 H High Point             16- 8       8     0    ++     4.79
   412 H High Point             16-13       3     0    +      2.79

Mercer Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Akron Mercer tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Mercer
Albany Albany insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Albany
American Mercer   Mercer
Arizona State Arizona State Arizona State  
Army Army   Army
Binghamton Mercer   Mercer
Boston College Boston College insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Boston College
Boston University Mercer   Mercer
Brown Brown   Brown
Bryant Mercer   Mercer
Bucknell Mercer tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Mercer
Butler Mercer insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Mercer
California California insuffient: ( 3- 0)( 2- 1) California
Campbell Mercer Mercer   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Canisius Mercer tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Mercer
Central Connecticut Mercer   Mercer
Central Michigan Mercer   Mercer
Cincinnati Mercer insuffient: ( 2- 3)( 1- 4) Mercer
Clemson Mercer Mercer  
Coastal Carolina Mercer insuffient: ( 4- 3)( 3- 4) Mercer
Colgate Mercer   Mercer
Colorado Colorado insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 2- 1) Colorado
Columbia Mercer   Mercer
Connecticut Connecticut   Connecticut
Cornell Cornell insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Cornell
Dartmouth Dartmouth insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Dartmouth
Davidson Mercer insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 2) Mercer
Delaware Delaware   Delaware
Delaware State Mercer Mercer   2- 1 vs 0- 3
Denver Denver Denver   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Detroit Mercy Mercer tied - ( 2- 2) ( 2- 2) Mercer
Drexel Drexel   Drexel
Duke Duke insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 3- 0) Duke
Duquesne Mercer   Mercer
East Carolina Mercer insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 1- 3) Mercer
Eastern Michigan Mercer tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Mercer
Elon Elon insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) Elon
Fairfield Mercer   Mercer
Fairleigh Dickinson Mercer Mercer   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Florida Florida Florida  
Furman Furman Furman  
Gardner Webb Mercer Mercer  
George Mason Mercer tied - ( 3- 0) ( 3- 0) Mercer
George Washington Mercer tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Mercer
Georgetown Georgetown   Georgetown
Harvard Harvard   Harvard
High Point Mercer Mercer  
Hofstra Hofstra   Hofstra
Holy Cross Holy Cross   Holy Cross
Howard (DC) Mercer insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Mercer
Iona Mercer   Mercer
Jacksonville Jacksonville Jacksonville  
James Madison James Madison James Madison   4- 0 vs 0- 4
Johns Hopkins Johns Hopkins tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Johns Hopkins
Kennesaw State Mercer Mercer  
Kent State Mercer tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Mercer
La Salle Mercer   Mercer
Lafayette Mercer   Mercer
Le Moyne Mercer   Mercer
Lehigh Mercer tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Mercer
Liberty Liberty tied - ( 3- 2) ( 3- 2) Liberty
Lindenwood Mercer tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) Mercer
LIU Mercer   Mercer
Longwood Mercer Mercer  
Louisville Louisville tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) Louisville
Loyola (MD) Loyola (MD) tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Loyola (MD)
Manhattan Mercer tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Mercer
Marist Mercer   Mercer
Marquette Marquette insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Marquette
Maryland Maryland insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Maryland
Massachusetts Massachusetts   Massachusetts
Massachusetts-Lowell Mercer   Mercer
Mercyhurst Mercer insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) Mercer
Merrimack Mercer insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Mercer
Michigan Michigan insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Michigan
Monmouth (NJ) Mercer   Mercer
Mount St Marys Mercer tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Mercer
Navy Navy tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) Navy
New Hampshire Mercer   Mercer
Niagara Mercer tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Mercer
North Carolina North Carolina North Carolina   3- 0 vs 1- 2
Northwestern Northwestern   Northwestern
Notre Dame Notre Dame insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Notre Dame
Ohio State Ohio State insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Ohio State
Old Dominion Mercer tied - ( 4- 3) ( 4- 3) Mercer
Oregon Mercer insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Mercer
Penn Penn tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Penn
Penn State Penn State   Penn State
Pittsburgh Pittsburgh insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 0- 3) Pittsburgh
Presbyterian Mercer Mercer  
Princeton Princeton   Princeton
Queens Mercer Mercer   4- 3 vs 2- 5
Quinnipiac Mercer   Mercer
Radford Mercer Mercer  
Rhode Island Mercer   Mercer
Richmond Richmond   Richmond
Rider Mercer tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Mercer
Robert Morris Mercer   Mercer
Rutgers Rutgers   Rutgers
Sacred Heart Mercer   Mercer
San Diego State Mercer insuffient: ( 3- 2)( 2- 3) Mercer
Siena Mercer   Mercer
South Florida South Florida South Florida  
Southern California Southern California insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) Southern California
St Bonaventure Mercer tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Mercer
St Francis Mercer   Mercer
St Josephs (PA) St Josephs (PA) tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) St Josephs (PA)
Stanford Stanford insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 3- 0) Stanford
Stetson Mercer Mercer   3- 3 vs 1- 5
Stonehill Mercer   Mercer
Stony Brook Stony Brook   Stony Brook
Syracuse Syracuse insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) Syracuse
Temple Mercer tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) Mercer
Towson Towson Towson   3- 0 vs 1- 2
UC Davis Mercer Mercer  
UMBC Mercer insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Mercer
UNC-Charlotte Mercer insuffient: ( 3- 2)( 4- 1) Mercer
Vanderbilt Vanderbilt Vanderbilt  
VCU Mercer tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Mercer
Vermont Mercer insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Mercer
Villanova Villanova tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Villanova
Virginia Virginia insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Virginia
Virginia Tech Virginia Tech Virginia Tech  
Wagner Mercer   Mercer
William & Mary Mercer tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Mercer
Winthrop Mercer Mercer  
Wofford Mercer Mercer  
Xavier Mercer insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 1- 3) Mercer
Yale Yale   Yale
Youngstown State Mercer tied - ( 3- 0) ( 3- 0) Mercer

PowerWise = 76


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 16.82

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 H South Florida   (13- 5, 88.3)     8-11      -11.57      18.98      -0.46         0.89           -10.66
   0 A Virginia Tech   ( 9- 9, 88.6)     7-11      -11.35      19.21       0.46         0.89            -9.64
   0 H Vanderbilt      ( 9- 9, 86.6)     7-19      -13.28      17.28      -0.46         0.89           -12.17
   0 H Kennesaw State  ( 4-11, 80.2)    20- 4      -19.73      10.83      -0.46         0.89             9.18
   0 A Arizona State   (11- 8, 88.8)    10-16      -11.06      19.50       0.46         0.89            -9.38
   0 N UC Davis        ( 6-10, 86.3)    18-11      -13.59      16.97      -0.00         0.89            15.03
   0 A Clemson         (13- 6, 91.3)    11-10       -8.59      21.97       0.46         0.89            19.86
   0 H Florida         (17- 2, 94.2)     9-22       -5.73      24.82      -0.46         0.89            -5.49
   0 H Jacksonville    (10- 6, 86.9)    14-16      -13.05      17.51      -0.46         0.89           -11.96
   0 H Wofford         ( 9-10, 80.7)    22- 8      -19.20      11.36      -0.46         0.89             9.65
   0 A Gardner Webb    ( 3-14, 76.0)    17- 4      -23.94       6.62       0.46         0.89             6.27
   0 H Radford         ( 2-14, 73.7)    20- 7      -26.21       4.35      -0.46         0.89             3.44
   0 A Presbyterian    ( 5-12, 75.7)    21- 4      -24.19       6.36       0.46         0.89             6.05
   0 H High Point      (12- 6, 86.4)    16-13      -13.51      17.04      -0.46         0.89            14.68
   0 A Winthrop        ( 6-11, 79.7)    15-14      -20.24      10.31       0.46         0.89             9.54
   0 H Furman          (14- 4, 84.2)    17-18      -15.74      14.81      -0.46         0.89           -14.35
   0 A Longwood        ( 1-14, 75.9)    19- 1      -23.99       6.57       0.46         0.89             6.23
   0 H Wofford         ( 9-10, 80.7)    15- 9      -19.20      11.36      -0.46         0.89             9.65
   0 H High Point      (12- 6, 86.4)    16- 8      -13.51      17.04      -0.46         0.89            14.68
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                        50.61

winning pts = 124.2521 losing points = -73.6430

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------